by Greg Fields
"We believe that it is impossible to bring out accurately, fully, and definitely, the sum and substance of what is taught in Scripture concerning the place which the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost hold in the salvation of sinners, without taking up Calvinistic ground, without being in a manner, necessitated to assert the fundamental principles of the Calvinistic system of theology. " (William Cunningham) These stirring words should constrain us to thoroughly study under the illumination of the Holy Spirit these "fundamental principles", to "gird up the loins of our minds", to think clearly and objectively, having our knowledge formed by grace. This is no small task. It requires diligence, longsuffering, and a humble teachable spirit. Amid the bewildering welter of ephemeral ideologies that we will inevitably confront in this pursuit of learning true Calvinism, we need to meditate upon the memorable words of Thomas Goodwin: "God is the most glorious object that our minds could ever fasten upon, the most alluring. Thoughts of Him should therefore swallow up all other thoughts. . . . ". "But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth Me, that I am the Lord. . . . . . " (Jer. 9:24a) .
As Charnock observed, "a man may be theologically knowing but spiritually
ignorant". A thoroughgoing Scriptural knowledge of Biblical soteriology
is only truly engendered by a fervent love for "The Lord Christ" (as Owen
affectionately and reverently addressed our Regal Lord and Saviour) . The
proper attitude of a Calvinist imbued with this fervent love for our Lord,
and possessing a comprehensive knowledge of Biblical, Systematic, and Historical
Calvinism, was wonderfully exemplified by a stalwart of the nineteenth
century, Mr. Alexander Carson. His remarks form a fitting conclusion to
this essay: " If there is a progress in the Christian's knowledge of the
Gospel itself, every step in that progress, he must get rid of a proportional
degree of ignorance and error. This proves, then , that perfect uniformity
of view, much less of language, even with respect to the gospel itself;
is not to be expected among Christians. According to their respective
progress, there will be a difference, whether expressed or not. As far
as Christians are taught of God they will agree. But even in the Gospel
they are not all equally taught of God. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nothing,
then, is farther from my wish then to be understood
as dooming to damnation
all who are not prepared to adopt the whole of my views. . . . . . . .
. . . that arrogance that makes a god and saviour of its clear views, that
confines salvation to a mode of expressing faith, that looks with contempt
on the body of Christians, as a sort of pious infidels, that seems to delight
in the fewness of the saved, finds no sanction from the Scriptures, and
originates in the pride of human nature, not in godly zeal for the truth.
When a man seems anxious to find out something in the faith of professing
Christians at which to cavil, when he strains their language to condemn
them, there is no ground to suppose that he is influenced by love. Keeping
clear, therefore, of a censorious spirit, I would wish to impress Christians
with the importance of my views of the subject. They have no sectarian
tendency, but address themselves to the candor. . . . . of all Christians.
The strength, the beauty, the glory of Christianity will appear in proportion
as it is viewed in this light. " (My emphasis)