Captain Ron'sSailing and Cruising Pages |
|
Florida Offshore Multihull Association
|
The Tartan
34: an Owner’s Review By Capt Ron Talk
about classic plastic, the TARTAN 34 is it ….
We owned a 1974 model back in the mid 80s and loved every minute of owning her in spite of a few
shortcomings. But I will say this,
for every shortcoming she had an advantage not the least of which was her design
firm of Sparkman & Stevens.
They knew how to design boats and you better believe Tartan knows how to
build them. Plus the main virtue,
price … you probably won’t find a better boat for the money. One of
the important features of this boat is a result of the rating rule in vogue at
the time she was designed. The CCA
rule. That rule did not penalize
the extra draft of the centerboard which, created an excellent cruising design
especially for the shallow waters of Florida, the Keys, Chesapeake Bay, Bahamas
and other such shallow places. Her
big sister the Tartan 37 is really an evolution of this fine design and carried
on the centerboard tradition. The
subsequent migration of ocean racing rating rules from the old CCA to IOR made
centerboard boats uncompetitive but that doesn’t mean that the Tartan 34
isn’t a fine sailing boat. As it
turns out, the Tartan’s centerboard gives you more than just shallow draft.
By controlling the depth of board and the Center of Lateral Resistance,
you can trim the Tartan 34 to neutral helm on just about any point of sail and
wind condition even lugging a big genoa on a tight reach.
By the way, reaching is where this boat really moves although she’ll
point right up there with the best of them. The
construction of the Tartan is fairly typical of the time.
The decks are cored with end grain balsa, which can cause soft spots to
develop in the deck especially where fittings are not properly installed.
The hulls as far as I know are solid glass and it is rare to find a
Tartan with structural issues. The
hull-deck joint is uniquely Tartan however and deserves mention.
When the hull is constructed a heavy ¼ inch aluminum plate is glassed in
around the perimeter of the turned inward hull flange.
Then when the deck is bonded to the hull, the cap rail is secured by
drilling and tapping through this plate, resulting in a very strong and
permanent hull-deck joint. Don’t let a surveyor tell you that the nuts are missing
from the protruding bolt ends up under the deck edge.
They never had nuts on them. I’m
sure that after a few years those bolts probably became permanently welded in
place as stainless bolts do when in contact with aluminum. The interior joinery is typical Tartan …
first rate … in teak… 90% of the interior joinery is held in place with
bronze Frearson head wood screws. Everything
in there unscrews … just don’t use a Phillips head driver on them …
they’ll strip every time. Jamestown
Distributors carries Frearson tips for your drill/driver and also has the bronze
screws. The centerboard mechanism is unique too.
I’ve never seen a similar system. The
board is mounted on a square shaft that extends through the centerboard trunk
and into the bilge. There’s a
cover plate (often glassed over) on the outside of the hull so that you can
remove this shaft. On the inside of
the bilge sump, there’s a stuffing box that keeps the water out although some
oozing is common. Just adjust it
like you would a prop shaft stuffing box. On the end of the square shaft is a lever
which actually raises and lowers the board by a system of cables connected to a
drum winch behind the forward end of the cockpit. A square drive crank handle fits the cockpit socket.
Wind the handle to the right the board comes up and wind it left, the
board goes down. Very precise
control of the board position is possible except for one thing.
The square shaft fits through the board in a square bronze hole.
This bronze fitting on most boats is worn to the point where the board
won’t fully retract. The corners
of the square shaft as well as the hole wear to rounded off, making for a sloppy
fit. The cure is to remove the board and replace the shaft and the bushing with
new components. This system has a
drawback however and that is, in a grounding the board does not automatically
kick up into the trunk. The cables
and winch hold it down. There is a
spring loading on the cable that will absorb some shock load but it would be
very easy to break a board in a hard grounding where some twisting motion was
involved. You need to be careful in
this regard and don’t use the board as an auxiliary depth sounder. The engine in the boat we had, was the old
Universal Atomic 4 … yep gasoline … all 25 hp of it. Ours ran fine and so we never got around to replacing it.
But many owners have replaced them.
Faryman diesels seem to have been a factory option, so many Tartans will
have that engine. Another point about the engine; it’s in the
middle of the saloon. This drawback
has advantages however. One is that
it places the engine’s weight near the center of the boat and as low as
possible. And secondly, you get great engine access once you remove the cover.
Of course, then you’re getting greasy engine stuff all over the
wife’s new rugs … not good. It
also produces heat which heats up the main saloon. Our boat had a fixed three blade prop that
worked fine although it did walk the stern to port in reverse … totally
predictable though. We sailed our Tartan 34 for 5 years on
Florida’s west coast … most of that in the Sanibel-Captiva to Key West area
… great cruising ground for a shoal draft boat … and we enjoyed every minute
of it. The Tartan was as trouble
free a boat as we ever owned. Our
son was raised in her V-berth. We never raced her but she sailed so well, I’m sure she would have showed well no matter what the rating rule but she is a cruiser at heart, and a great one.
|