Captain Ron'sSailing and Cruising Pages |
|
Florida Offshore Multihull Association
|
Getting a little more from your GPSBy Ron Butler Ok, I’ve ranted about the shortcomings of Garmin and other brands of GPSs so this time I thought I’d share some of the virtues. Of course, the greatest virtue of the GPS is that it has made child’s play of navigation; literally. It’s now like playing a video game. Color chart plotters and mapping software have made obsolete such nautical artifacts as the sextant, parallel rules, course computers and even LORAN. But please note that they haven’t yet displaced paper (or plastic) nautical charts anymore than digital books have replaced the paperback. This is not to suggest that you don’t need to know how to work a DR plot or use a hand bearing compass, on the contrary, the old techniques still work, it’s just that GPS has made it so very much easier. I carry two Garmin GPSs on Kismet. One is attached to the binnacle and is used for steering and the other is anchored to the chart table at the nav station and interfaced to a laptop computer. First the steering GPS.
I think it is essential to have a late model DGPS within easy sight of
the helmsman. The one I have, is one of the first DGPS units to hit he market
and it is a chart plotter type with a 6” (vertical) black & white screen.
It is a Garmin GPSMap 230 . There
are a number of issues with this unit that I have discussed elsewhere but it
does have a NEMA 0183 interface, which enables me to display navigation
information on my Furuno Radar. This
is a very handy feature. For one
thing, the radar will display our GOTO waypoint as a target with a rhumb-line
course from our position. This can
be a confirmation of our plan vs. actual if the next waypoint happens to have a
radar signature. A large buoy used
as a waypoint, for example, would show up on radar.
If the return from the buoy is not inside the target, there might be
reason to investigate. One night we were traversing the space between Three Rooker
Bar and Anclote Key on Florida’s west coast.
The waypoint I chose to use appeared on the radar screen as a target
squarely on dry land. It had
been years since we visited this area and shoaling had built an island where our
old waypoint was located. Good
thing for radar. The integrated system also displays our heading, bearing,
position, speed, etc on the radar display.
I can see both the radar and the GPS displays from the steering station
but because I have them interfaced, I can also see all of the nav information on
the radar display from a nice cozy spot up under the dodger.
This is because I have the radar mounted to a swinging arm that we swing
into the main companionway when we are using the radar in the cockpit.
This mounting position unclutters the helmsman’s view ahead and enables
a nice sheltered watch-keeping spot under the dodger when making a passage in
less than fun conditions. This
swinging mount also means that I can see the radar from the nav station by
simply swinging the radar screen into the cabin. We also keep the track feature of the GPS turned on thus
leaving our little trail of breadcrumbs should we need to find our way back the
way we just came. More on this
feature later. Next, the nav station GPS.
This unit is a small, inexpensive, handheld, Garmin GPS72 set into a
mounting bracket on the nav desk. It
is wired to ship’s power and interfaced to our laptop computer.
When we are underway I usually keep our MapTech Ocean Navigator software
up and running and displaying our current position from the GPS.
This system constantly keeps our route, track and position displayed so
if we need a quick look at exactly where we are, a peek down the main
companionway at the laptop screen does it.
Of course the software will also display all the nav info from the GPS as
well. This system is used to plan
our travels as well as provide an immediate route check.
We usually plan our next day’s travels the evening before we depart
using the laptop system and then manually transfer the waypoints to the steering
computer. Time consuming, yes, but
it is also a built in redundancy. In
the Bahamas the planned route on the computer is an estimate using artificially
spotted waypoints. The route I key
into the steering plotter is usually pulled manually from the Explorer
Chartbooks using their waypoints or waypoints that I have already entered into
the GPSMAP 230. Generally our
routes are less than 70 miles long since we prefer to stop overnight, mostly. The redundancy comes in once I’ve keyed a route into the
steering GPS. If the planned route
was say 50 miles long and I key in a route that ends up 62 miles long then I
have a cue to check things out. Likewise
when we’re out sailing and our actual path ends up wildly different from the
plan on the computer, it’s time for some do over or at least a reasonableness
check. I do not have either GPS interfaced to the autopilot, nor
do I have them interfaced to each other. They
are two independent displays. I
think this is a reasonably good way to set things up.
Sure I could interface one of them to the autopilot but I prefer to
correct our course myself according to the steering GPS and compass while
occasionally checking it against where the MapTech plot shows us.
Also I think that navigation requires that you keep your head outside of
the boat and thinking about what you see out there rather than playing the video
game displayed on some LCD monitor. In
the Bahamas especially, you must always be aware of the water color, the wind
and wave set, the tidal flows and other boats.
In the Bahamas, there are no channel markers nor should you need any. The water is so clear that the bottom is visible in 40 feet
or more of water in most places. The
water color marks your channel and while the Explorer charts that I have on
paper and in my MapTech system are the most reliable there are, you still
navigate passes and anchorages by sight. In
addition, the visual cues such as the shape of a headland, an airplane taking
off or landing, the channel wash, a radio tower or a stone monument offer
confirmation of what the charts and GPS are telling you.
Lesson #1 for cruising the islands, ”Keep your head out of the boat!” I can remember at least one time where we were approaching
Darby Cut from the east and saw a plane landing on the island ahead of us.
We couldn’t see the pass but assumed it was behind a headland.
I didn’t remember a landing strip near Black Point or Darby Cut.
A quick chart check showed the nearest airplane patch to be Staniel Cay.
We changed course and figured out what happened.
I had fat-fingered the waypoint coordinates for Darby Cut.
We were actually 3 miles north of where we thought we were.
Of course, a quick look at the MapTech system showed our error.
I suppose one could argue that having the steering GPS interfaced such
that we could electronically transfer waypoints and routes would save this kind
of error. Yes, it would and it
would be much easier to boot especially if both systems could share the same
library of routes and waypoints. The
problem comes in from being unable to transfer data to and from the now old and
obsolete GPSMap 230. The
good news is that our position was in real time display down at the nav station
so I didn’t have to waste time plotting it on a paper chart.
By the way, we always keep the paper chart of our immediate navigation
area in the cockpit for handy reference. I would also relate the cautionary tale from last year,
when a large motor-yacht ran onto a reef attempting to enter Little Harbor on
Long Island. I’ve been in that
wonderful little hole and we’ve always entered and exited based on the
Explorer Charts using their waypoints and our own eyeballs with no issues.
The power boat was following their RayMarine chartplotter and relying on
it as their sole means of navigation. The
RayMarine system does not use the Explorer Chart data and clearly shows an
entrance to the lagoon that is barred by a barely submerged reef of stag horn
coral. I’ve been diving on that
reef and at low tide, it is right at the surface.
The Explorer Charts clearly show the reef blocking the northern entrance
to the lagoon. The motor-yacht ran
right onto the reef. Just keeping
their eyes out of the boat should have told them that their electronic chart was
wrong. Later we found out that
RayMarine is one company of several that have refused to pay Explorer Charts
royalties to use their data and so make their own charts based on satellite or
other sources. If you cruise the
Bahamas, you need the Explorer Charts, period.
No other charts are as frequently updated or as thoroughly researched.
If you’re buying electronic charts for use in the Bahamas, make sure
they are based on the Explorer Charts data.
I have no interest in Explorer Charts, by the way, I am just a convinced
customer; Nothing against RayMarine either just one more little item to keep in
mind. I mentioned our breadcrumbs. We always have the track feature turned on in both the
MapTech system and the helm GPS. We
record a track about every 2 boat lengths as we progress. This feature we find very useful at least once in a while
even if it is a bit of overkill. More
than once we have found ourselves in a position where we had to navigate a
narrow channel in less than ideal visual conditions, sometimes even at night.
Steering our way out of a risky passage at night for example, may only be
possible because we have tracks that we can follow.
Sure it takes some practice to learn to steer the boat so that it stays
on ‘track’ but it can be done. We
zoom our steering GPS map screen in to the ¼ mile display for this purpose.
By the way, the track feature works whether or not you have a chart
cartridge in the machine. We have also used tracks to negotiate alternative
anchorages. Some small cays and
islands in the Bahamas offer anchoring protection from only one wind direction,
usually east. This is fine so long
as the wind doesn’t shift. Usually
you get large wind shifts with the passing or approach of some major weather
system feature such as a cold front. If
we suspect that we may get such a wind shift sometime in the near future, we
will scout out an alternative anchorage just in case we have to make a move.
Usually you can count on the wind shifts to happen at night or other
adverse condition. By scouting the
alternative anchorage with our track feature on, we feel comfortable making the
move even if we can’t see the water color all that well. Tracks might also serve a safety function.
If someone were to fall overboard, returning to the location would be
easier if you can follow tracks. Thankfully
we’ve never had to use that or the MOB feature of the GPS. We also make extensive use of the route feature on the
steering GPS and the MapTech software. We
plan the route using MapTech and then enter the waypoints we want to use,
manually to the steering GPS. While
we do change course by pushing buttons on the autopilot or by hand if we are
hand steering, having the route pre-entered to automatically announce the
arrival at a waypoint and then change to the next waypoint, saves fumbling with
the GOTO feature right when you’re busy changing trim or getting set-up for
the new course. Having the route and tracks displayed also allows you to
see where and when you went off course. This
I have found to be very helpful when doing post race analysis where the tracks
will show you every lift and header. I have even used these features to call a tack when I see on
the GPS that we’ve sailed into a favorable shift. While I’m sure there is nothing new here to some cruisers, I hope I’ve managed to get you thinking about how you use your onboard GPS systems. Sure there are more sophisticated and expensive systems out there but this works for us. Thanks for reading; hope it was helpful. |